CWW 22.0 (Created World Wrestling)

Punk wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Punk wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Punk wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Punk wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Punk wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Punk wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Against.

Mitch has approved, though

If that is the case, it is okay to do it because it is Mitch's decision in the end. I still don't support the idea however. There's something about a third party doing the final show on such a long lasting thread that isn't right. An EFNW tribute is a different story, but an EFNW-managed CWW show to finish the company is wrong.

EFNW has nothing to do with it bruvva. CWW deserves a final show; so I'm doing one. It is quite possible that Mitch will return for this one show btw.

What I meant is it's none of your business to do it.

I'm a Hall of Famer; I've been the GM of War, Smashdown, Revolution and TNW all for an extended period of time; I've been in CWW since day 1; I was supposed to be in the Main Event of B2D against Marcus Kane; I'm one of the closest people to Mitch on this site.

... So how is it none of my business, you fool?

I don't care what you've done in CWW, it doesn't make it your business to handle its last moment. Like I said, since you have Mitch's permission, more power to you. I'm just saying if I were in such a position I'd decline. If I were to have had an ECCW GM who was with me for the longest time in ECCW, I still wouldn't want anybody but me to put on a final show.

You seriously need to put your ego aside and start listening to the people.

What does this have to do with ego? I'm stating my opinion. So how about you listen to what I've got to say.

This has a lot to do with your ego, actually. Despite the fact that everybody - including Mitch - has approved of this idea, it is only fitting that Jarrett "The 1%" Calloway decides to dwell over an abundance of his STUPID philosophies.

How about you stop being a little bitch and help us remember the awesome legacy of CWW that we ALL created together.

Brah, just start going with shit and life will be a lot less stressful for everyone

I see no sense in continuing to fight it. As I said, it's Mitch's decision. But his approval doesn't make it a good thing to do. You have good intentions but I wouldn't bother.

And since we're talking about egos, it's about time you learn to keep your own in check. You seem to have convinced yourself you're hot shit because you're running a semi successful thread.

I am hot shit. Seriously, have you seen the size of my dick?

Nah but seriously, you can't refer to ECCW as "The Greatest Caw Thread of All Time" and call me up about anything ego-related...

Hot shit, cold shit, you're still shit no matter what. And right here should be the time where you thank me publicly for making EFNW everything that it is today. I brought EFNW back to life, not you or anybody else. It was merely "that third e-fed" until I gave my character your world title.

I've got every right in this world to call ECCW the greatest CAW thread of all time. I've got the facts to prove it. Back in the day, CWW was the one to beat, ECCW was a up and comer with just a little ounce of promise, and EFNW was that clique-y fed in the games section. But look how much has changed. CWW is now a memory; ECCW boasts the claim of greatest ever, and EFNW is just now learning to survive in the appropriate forum with an appropriate variety of users. So much has changed but so much has not. Let's face the facts, EFNW has never been consistent. It's had those hot streaks and then death spikes, more "extreme" ones than ECCW's. While all three feds have had their ups and downs, none have stayed down quite like EFNW. Out of the three biggies, ECCW is the only to have never gone on hiatus. EFNW has been on it longer than any of the others. Your argument may be the ECCW is still the youngest. Sure, but if you take away the time EFNW has been on hiatus throughout its lifespan, it'd be a stretch to say it has been putting on shows for much more time than ECCW has been. Another note is that as of late I have had more people against me and more and more that are out to get me. Because of our feds, you, Mitch, and I have garnered big reputations with big expectations. And despite the fact I'd go out on a limb to say I'm the least liked of the three, I'd also say I'm equally respected if not more. I've been able to keep ECCW alive every single day for almost three years now, without breaks, without bullshit booking (i.e. the ring blows up?, the loser does sexual favors?, bombs strapped to chests?), and without too many problems, despite my record of being hated on.

And now I feel like I am straying away from the real topic. I've been able to keep my thread alive quite well, arguably better than either of you, but without a doubt better than you. So aside from everything I just said, what else makes ECCW the best? Ask the people -- they're the ones that have voted ECCW not the best CAW, but best thread out there eight times. Eight times out of the eight times ECCW has been nominated; an undefeated awards record. Calling it the best isn't to feed my ego, it's to present the facts shown to me by the people that haved not only nominated ECCW as the greatest eight times, but gave it the win eight times. Still not convinced? Let's count how many times EFNW was also nominated. The majority of the time it was. Sure, it came in second, I'll give you that. Hats off. But as far as I'm concerned, that's all it'll ever be. Second rate to ECCW. And since you're asking for personal remarks, that's all you'll ever be ... second rate to me.

Hazza, theres not a point. Everythings all about Jarrett.

Ziggler wrote:

Hazza, theres not a point. Everythings all about Jarrett.

Talk to me once you've created a successful e-fed.

*Prediction: you will view this post as egotistical, I will say it's factual, not egotistical. We fight.

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

Hazza, theres not a point. Everythings all about Jarrett.

Talk to me once you've created a successful e-fed.

*Prediction: you will view this post as egotistical, I will say it's factual, not egotistical. We fight.

But you have to realize, that your not the only one who can make a successful e-fed. Its not all about you.

Ziggler wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

Hazza, theres not a point. Everythings all about Jarrett.

Talk to me once you've created a successful e-fed.

*Prediction: you will view this post as egotistical, I will say it's factual, not egotistical. We fight.

But you have to realize, that your not the only one who can make a successful e-fed. Its not all about you.

Study your history. I've stated on numerous occasions that Hazza and Mitch have created successful e-feds. That'd be why when I say "the three of us" everybody knows who I'm referring to.

As for Hazza, he made a successful thread but has not managed a thread as successful as ECCW.

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

Hazza, theres not a point. Everythings all about Jarrett.

Talk to me once you've created a successful e-fed.

*Prediction: you will view this post as egotistical, I will say it's factual, not egotistical. We fight.

But you have to realize, that your not the only one who can make a successful e-fed. Its not all about you.

Study your history. I've stated on numerous occasions that Hazza and Mitch have created successful e-feds. That'd be why when I say "the three of us" everybody knows who I'm referring to.

As for Hazza, he made a successful thread but has not managed a thread as successful as ECCW.

Did I points out Hazza or Mitch?
All I said, is that your not the only one. Plus, without roleplayers, ECCW would be nothing.

Ziggler wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

Hazza, theres not a point. Everythings all about Jarrett.

Talk to me once you've created a successful e-fed.

*Prediction: you will view this post as egotistical, I will say it's factual, not egotistical. We fight.

But you have to realize, that your not the only one who can make a successful e-fed. Its not all about you.

Study your history. I've stated on numerous occasions that Hazza and Mitch have created successful e-feds. That'd be why when I say "the three of us" everybody knows who I'm referring to.

As for Hazza, he made a successful thread but has not managed a thread as successful as ECCW.

Did I points out Hazza or Mitch?
All I said, is that your not the only one. Plus, without roleplayers, ECCW would be nothing.

Thanks for repeating another statement I've made several times in the past. When ECCW's second anniversary came around last year, who was it I thanked most?

I don't know. Never really paid attention to it, and I have my reasons for that. I know you said that you don't care for the idea and all that shit, but if Mitch has agreed to it, you have no control, so why the bickering between you and Harry? You voiced your opinion, and he voiced his. Mitch makes the final decision and he already has chosen what he wants to do.

Ziggler wrote:

I don't know. Never really paid attention to it, and I have my reasons for that. I know you said that you don't care for the idea and all that shit, but if Mitch has agreed to it, you have no control, so why the bickering between you and Harry? You voiced your opinion, and he voiced his. Mitch makes the final decision and he already has chosen what he wants to do.

This I completely agree with. I'm just continuing the discussion that Harry chose to allow to continue. It seems it has taken a turn in a different direction anyways.

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

I don't know. Never really paid attention to it, and I have my reasons for that. I know you said that you don't care for the idea and all that shit, but if Mitch has agreed to it, you have no control, so why the bickering between you and Harry? You voiced your opinion, and he voiced his. Mitch makes the final decision and he already has chosen what he wants to do.

This I completely agree with. I'm just continuing the discussion that Harry chose to allow to continue. It seems it has taken a turn in a different direction anyways.

I understand that. But, there wasn't a point for all the non-sence.

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

I don't know. Never really paid attention to it, and I have my reasons for that. I know you said that you don't care for the idea and all that shit, but if Mitch has agreed to it, you have no control, so why the bickering between you and Harry? You voiced your opinion, and he voiced his. Mitch makes the final decision and he already has chosen what he wants to do.

This I completely agree with. I'm just continuing the discussion that Harry chose to allow to continue. It seems it has taken a turn in a different direction anyways.

No, both of you allowed for the discussion to continue. Did Harry force you to keep on replying to him? No. So be a man and accept your damn actions.

Earl Bagdassorov wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

I don't know. Never really paid attention to it, and I have my reasons for that. I know you said that you don't care for the idea and all that shit, but if Mitch has agreed to it, you have no control, so why the bickering between you and Harry? You voiced your opinion, and he voiced his. Mitch makes the final decision and he already has chosen what he wants to do.

This I completely agree with. I'm just continuing the discussion that Harry chose to allow to continue. It seems it has taken a turn in a different direction anyways.

No, both of you allowed for the discussion to continue. Did Harry force you to keep on replying to him? No. So be a man and accept your damn actions.

Seems to me like you misinterpreted the sentence.

"I'm just continuing the discussion" -- my admission I allowed it to continue.

Jarrett wrote:

Earl Bagdassorov wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Ziggler wrote:

I don't know. Never really paid attention to it, and I have my reasons for that. I know you said that you don't care for the idea and all that shit, but if Mitch has agreed to it, you have no control, so why the bickering between you and Harry? You voiced your opinion, and he voiced his. Mitch makes the final decision and he already has chosen what he wants to do.

This I completely agree with. I'm just continuing the discussion that Harry chose to allow to continue. It seems it has taken a turn in a different direction anyways.

No, both of you allowed for the discussion to continue. Did Harry force you to keep on replying to him? No. So be a man and accept your damn actions.

Seems to me like you misinterpreted the sentence.

"I'm just continuing the discussion" -- my admission I allowed it to continue.

You're damn right I did. You know why I can accept the fact that I misread the sentence? Because I'm a man. And as a man, I dont brag about whether my e-fed is better than another.

I'm done here

I'm gonna get a bus now

Remember when I was GM of the Year and Domination was Brand of the Year 'cause of me? Good times...

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Then again, when did you ever give it a real shot?

Says the lifelong virgin

Aight, I'm gonna go catch my bus. We can continue this in PMs if you want

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Then again, when did you ever give it a real shot?

I gave it somewhat of a shot with Vick Rocker in Doom, then just gave up cause I got bored.

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Then again, when did you ever give it a real shot?

I gave it somewhat of a shot with Vick Rocker in Doom, then just gave up cause I got bored.

I didn't ask you when you gave it somewhat of a shot, I asked you when you gave it a shot.

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Then again, when did you ever give it a real shot?

I gave it somewhat of a shot with Vick Rocker in Doom, then just gave up cause I got bored.

I didn't ask you when you gave it somewhat of a shot, I asked you when you gave it a shot.

Look at it this way

You looking for A SHOT

I gave somewhat of A SHOT

The words A SHOT are in there, therefore you have what your looking for

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Then again, when did you ever give it a real shot?

I gave it somewhat of a shot with Vick Rocker in Doom, then just gave up cause I got bored.

I didn't ask you when you gave it somewhat of a shot, I asked you when you gave it a shot.

Look at it this way

You looking for A SHOT

I gave somewhat of A SHOT

The words A SHOT are in there, therefore you have what your looking for

And you are still a fag, Jarrett.

Marik Sweatshirt wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Then again, when did you ever give it a real shot?

I gave it somewhat of a shot with Vick Rocker in Doom, then just gave up cause I got bored.

I didn't ask you when you gave it somewhat of a shot, I asked you when you gave it a shot.

Look at it this way

You looking for A SHOT

I gave somewhat of A SHOT

The words A SHOT are in there, therefore you have what your looking for

And you are still a fag, Jarrett.

But "A SHOT" implies I asked for A SHOT, not an additional word added before it.

Jarrett wrote:

Marik Sweatshirt wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Brooklyn Rage! wrote:

I never really cared for ECCW. EFNW and CWW are the feds I like, not a big fan of ECCW.

Then again, when did you ever give it a real shot?

I gave it somewhat of a shot with Vick Rocker in Doom, then just gave up cause I got bored.

I didn't ask you when you gave it somewhat of a shot, I asked you when you gave it a shot.

Look at it this way

You looking for A SHOT

I gave somewhat of A SHOT

The words A SHOT are in there, therefore you have what your looking for

And you are still a fag, Jarrett.

But "A SHOT" implies I asked for A SHOT, not an additional word added before it.

Why you complaining? You got the phrase you were looking for. I just tacked something on there to make it a little more truthful.

...I think Jarrett likes to argue.

He doesn't care to take part in ECCW. It was not to his liking. My goodness, just leave it alone. And stop making me come back to this topic for new posts if the last show isn't up yet.