*Contains Spoilers* The next GM.

As you know, according to Vickie, on the 1000th Episode, the BoD is going to announce the next GM of Both Brands on that show. Just wondering here, who do you think will get the job?

In my personal opinion, I think they will give it to Teddy, or possibly Paul Heyman. Oh, by the way. Teddy is the Guest GM for next week's Raw and Smackdown. Teddy because he ran Smackdown and ECW good, and Paul Heyman to further along the Heyman, Lesnar/HHH Storyline.

I put in the title that this has spoilers as I am pretty sure that this contains spoilers from Smackdown.

If Heyman's sticking around, then why not him? Although they'd have to come up with a reasonable explanation as to why, what with the current storyline involving himself and Triple H. If they can get around that, then he'd be an excellent choice.

The only spoiler, if it is one, is that Teddy is GM for next week's Raw and SD.

And the first part about what Vickie said, she said that on Monday.

Tom wrote:

If Heyman's sticking around, then why not him? Although they'd have to come up with a reasonable explanation as to why, what with the current storyline involving himself and Triple H. If they can get around that, then he'd be an excellent choice.

Simple.

Instead of Trips contacting Heyman, the BoD does, and to try to make peace with him, offers him the job because of this and the fact that he GM'ed Smackdown and ECW as well. It all surrounds the Lawsuit. Or hell, even Trips could offer it to him, instead of Heyman, cause you know, he's "COO"

John Laurinaitis.

No. No Johnny.

Richie wrote:

No. No Johnny.

And why is that?

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Richie wrote:

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Because he wasn't fired. Are you also aware he has been a part of every Raw live event since then?

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Because he wasn't fired. Are you also aware he has been a part of every Raw live event since then?

Since what, 10 days ago? Yeah, actually I did know that. But on TV, he was fired.

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Because he wasn't fired. Are you also aware he has been a part of every Raw live event since then?

Since what, 10 days ago? Yeah, actually I did know that. But on TV, he was fired.

He'll be back.

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Because he wasn't fired. Are you also aware he has been a part of every Raw live event since then?

Since what, 10 days ago? Yeah, actually I did know that. But on TV, he was fired.

He'll be back.

Nope. You're crazy.

Yeah, Johnnys done. The whole reason they fired him, is cause fans can`t stand him.

Fans not happy = WWE not happy.

I read somewhere that Johnny will come back, with a storyline saying that the BoD likes what he did and they wanted him to keep it up.

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Because he wasn't fired. Are you also aware he has been a part of every Raw live event since then?

Since what, 10 days ago? Yeah, actually I did know that. But on TV, he was fired.

He'll be back.

Nope. You're crazy.

Okay then, let me ask you this. If he has been pulled off from TV for good and no longer has a backstage role, why is he still on the payroll?

And Nick, since when is getting heat a bad thing?

TJ, I read something similar. That he has "contractual obligations" to stay. I've also heard him coming back with Lesnar and or Heyman.

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Because he wasn't fired. Are you also aware he has been a part of every Raw live event since then?

Since what, 10 days ago? Yeah, actually I did know that. But on TV, he was fired.

He'll be back.

Nope. You're crazy.

Okay then, let me ask you this. If he has been pulled off from TV for good and no longer has a backstage role, why is he still on the payroll?

And Nick, since when is getting heat a bad thing?

TJ, I read something similar. That he has "contractual obligations" to stay. I've also heard him coming back with Lesnar and or Heyman.

For storyline purposes. But that doesn't mean he'll be back as GM.

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Richie wrote:

Explain this to me. If he was just fired, by Vince McMahon, who is apart of the BoD, I might add, why would they give him the job back?

Because he wasn't fired. Are you also aware he has been a part of every Raw live event since then?

Since what, 10 days ago? Yeah, actually I did know that. But on TV, he was fired.

He'll be back.

Nope. You're crazy.

Okay then, let me ask you this. If he has been pulled off from TV for good and no longer has a backstage role, why is he still on the payroll?

And Nick, since when is getting heat a bad thing?

TJ, I read something similar. That he has "contractual obligations" to stay. I've also heard him coming back with Lesnar and or Heyman.

For storyline purposes. But that doesn't mean he'll be back as GM.

Whatever the name, he will be performing GM duties.

Well JearBear.

As John Cena stated on RAW, WWE`s fan base is 9 year olds. Hence why Cena is the face of the WWE. Children love their Superheros, hence why Cena is SuperCena. Children love HEROS.

Quote :

HEROS

Quote :

HEROS

Quote :

HEROS

Quote :

HEROS

Quote :

HEROS

and that is why .. Because Children = Ratings,
and WWE thirves for Ratings

Laurinatis = Heel
Heel = What kids hate.
Kids = Ratings.

ONE OF THESE THINGS JUST DOESN'T BELONG HERE.

He may be back, but they won't give him as much air time as he's gotten, and he won't be GM.

SP wrote:

Well JearBear.

As John Cena stated on RAW, WWE`s fan base is 9 year olds. Hence why Cena is the face of the WWE. Children love their Superheros, hence why Cena is SuperCena. Children love HEROS.

Quote :

HEROS

Quote :

HEROS

Quote :

HEROS

Quote :

HEROS

Spoiler:

and that is why .. Because Children = Ratings,
and WWE thirves for Ratings

Laurinatis = Heel
Heel = What kids hate.
Kids = Ratings.

ONE OF THESE THINGS JUST DOESN'T BELONG HERE.

He may be back, but they won't give him as much air time as he's gotten, and he won't be GM.

First of all, I'd ask why half of the roster is comprised of heels? I'd also like to point ot that according to WWE Corporate, whose word is a bit more reliable than that of John Cena, states that a 70% + majority of the WWE audience is over the age of 21.

Know what JearBear.

You have a good point.

But, why is WWE going to go all through all this, just to rehire him.
I mean, personally I kinda like how Punk and everyone makes fun of him. hes the heel GM that everyone loves to hate. But, kids don't and if the WWE is mostly all 21 year olds, why is it PG? Kids are still raking in ratings JearBear.

SP wrote:

Know what JearBear.

You have a good point.

But, why is WWE going to go all through all this, just to rehire him.
I mean, personally I kinda like how Punk and everyone makes fun of him. hes the heel GM that everyone loves to hate. But, kids don't and if the WWE is mostly all 21 year olds, why is it PG? Kids are still raking in ratings JearBear.

Why would they bother? For the same reason they bothered to "fire" John Cena for a month even though he was on every Raw during that period.

By the way Richie, still waiting on those PMs.

Jarrett wrote:

By the way Richie, still waiting on those PMs.

By the way, Jarrett. Shut up, I'll get it to you.