**Spoilers**Awesome**Spoilers**

At the Biggest Stage of them all,Wrestlemania.''The Game'' Triple H makes his return at Wrestlemania 27

JD wrote:

''King'' ExtremeStyles wrote:

At the Biggest Stage of them all,Wrestlemania.''The Game'' Triple H makes his return at Wrestlemania 27

Why is that awesome?

Cause WWE will be decent again

Ah, 2.21.11 should be Triple H tbh.

Triple H is supposed to return soon. Maybe he is 2/21/11, with a new gimmick. Could be facing Sheamus at 'Mania.

Triple Haich will be back? Well looks like hard work goes out the window again time for 200 title runs for Sneezerman

Dan wrote:

Triple Haich will be back? Well looks like hard work goes out the window again time for 200 title runs for Sneezerman

Yeah but, Morrison sucks a lot of penis apparantly. YEAH BUDDY.

No he is not coming back at 2/21 he's coming back at Mania I watched the youtube video(which the user closed his own account)so at 2/21 I know that's the Undertaker.

God wrote:

Dan wrote:

Triple Haich will be back? Well looks like hard work goes out the window again time for 200 title runs for Sneezerman

Yeah but, Morrison sucks a lot of penis apparantly. YEAH BUDDY.

Your mad that he makes Melina scream at night. YEAHHHHHHHHHHH BUDDDDDDDY

Dan wrote:

God wrote:

Dan wrote:

Triple Haich will be back? Well looks like hard work goes out the window again time for 200 title runs for Sneezerman

Yeah but, Morrison sucks a lot of penis apparantly. YEAH BUDDY.

Your mad that he makes Melina scream at night. YEAHHHHHHHHHHH BUDDDDDDDY

Batista makes her scream to, while she's dating Morrison. With his permission.

Yeah, JoMo whores out Melina.

Hahahaha, ES you were wrong!

1. Trips didn't beat 'Taker like you said he would.
2. He didn't even return at WM...

Jarrett wrote:

Hahahaha, ES you were wrong!

1. Trips didn't beat 'Taker like you said he would.
2. He didn't even return at WM...

As good as the match was, however...I wasn't fond of it. If for no other reason than Taker's clearly on his last legs in the business, and there's no point in wasting an opportunity to put over someone new by having them challenge the Streak. Triple H did NOT need to face Taker again, and the fact that he walked out of that match while Taker had to be carted out was pathetic booking.

Cyrus T: He's BACK! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Hahahaha, ES you were wrong!

1. Trips didn't beat 'Taker like you said he would.
2. He didn't even return at WM...

As good as the match was, however...I wasn't fond of it. If for no other reason than Taker's clearly on his last legs in the business, and there's no point in wasting an opportunity to put over someone new by having them challenge the Streak. Triple H did NOT need to face Taker again, and the fact that he walked out of that match while Taker had to be carted out was pathetic booking.

Wade Barrett was definitely the better option. Even if he failed to break the streak, losing (but putting up a good fight) against Undertaker at WrestleMania would have been much better for Barrett's career, as opposed to losing a five-minute match against the randomly-paired team of Show, Kane, Kofi, and Santino.

And some of the morons in creative think it's a good idea to book HHH vs. 'Taker AGAIN for the third time at next year's WrestleMania. If they go through with that, they're dumb, plain and simple.

Jarrett wrote:

Cyrus T: He's BACK! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Hahahaha, ES you were wrong!

1. Trips didn't beat 'Taker like you said he would.
2. He didn't even return at WM...

As good as the match was, however...I wasn't fond of it. If for no other reason than Taker's clearly on his last legs in the business, and there's no point in wasting an opportunity to put over someone new by having them challenge the Streak. Triple H did NOT need to face Taker again, and the fact that he walked out of that match while Taker had to be carted out was pathetic booking.

Wade Barrett was definitely the better option. Even if he failed to break the streak, losing (but putting up a good fight) against Undertaker at WrestleMania would have been much better for Barrett's career, as opposed to losing a five-minute match against the randomly-paired team of Show, Kane, Kofi, and Santino.

And some of the morons in creative think it's a good idea to book HHH vs. 'Taker AGAIN for the third time at next year's WrestleMania. If they go through with that, they're dumb, plain and simple.

Yet again why WWE stands for Worst Wrestling Ever...well, at least it's not TNA. TNA would book Undertaker to lose at Wrestlemania to Rob Terry...and that's just wrong.

Cyrus T: He's BACK! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Cyrus T: He's BACK! wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Hahahaha, ES you were wrong!

1. Trips didn't beat 'Taker like you said he would.
2. He didn't even return at WM...

As good as the match was, however...I wasn't fond of it. If for no other reason than Taker's clearly on his last legs in the business, and there's no point in wasting an opportunity to put over someone new by having them challenge the Streak. Triple H did NOT need to face Taker again, and the fact that he walked out of that match while Taker had to be carted out was pathetic booking.

Wade Barrett was definitely the better option. Even if he failed to break the streak, losing (but putting up a good fight) against Undertaker at WrestleMania would have been much better for Barrett's career, as opposed to losing a five-minute match against the randomly-paired team of Show, Kane, Kofi, and Santino.

And some of the morons in creative think it's a good idea to book HHH vs. 'Taker AGAIN for the third time at next year's WrestleMania. If they go through with that, they're dumb, plain and simple.

Yet again why WWE stands for Worst Wrestling Ever...well, at least it's not TNA. TNA would book Undertaker to lose at Wrestlemania to Rob Terry...and that's just wrong.

No TNA would book Taker to lose to Lacey Von Erich