Best Superstar not in HOF

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

How often do you see 2 legendary icons, 1 being the boss' son-in-law and the other defending his undefeated streak at a great event, take chair shots to each other and be fined for it?? I mean it was great!!

How often do we see 2 legendary icons, one defending his streak at a big event? Well, umm...3 years in a row at the biggest event.

how many times have we seen taker and sting face off? never.

Jarrett wrote:

Another factor is that every year, everyone compares Undertaker's WrestleMania match to the previous years', which can be good or bad.

okay, let's focus on its match compared to what the main event of Wrestlemania should be. We are talking about the biggest wrestling match of the year. it wasn't even close to that. it didn't deserve its spot on the card. i don't care what legends are in the match, it didn't deserve its spot.

I agree with all of you. Sting going to TNA was a shitty move. And if you ask me, Taker's best match in recent years was him vs HBK at WM 25. 26 was really bad. 27 was worse. I totally would have been more pumped if Sting went to WWE. Personally, I think TNA is a WWE/WCW graveyard. It's a waste of time and money to hire them, only for them to leave a year or two later to go to WWE. Sting will finally realize that TNA sucks and he'd rather be in the HOF than be a champ that only wrestles (and beats) two people in the company. And that's why TNA sucks. They have only 3 guys fightin for the championship, too many Angle/Jarret matches, and poor use of young talent. I mean, the Orton Cena feud as continuous, but it atleast had different match types thrown in evey PPV. And there you go. It went from Taker to Sting to TNA Sucks. TNA can ruin a good conversation, can't it?

Cole [RIP Savage] wrote:

I agree with all of you. Sting going to TNA was a shitty move. And if you ask me, Taker's best match in recent years was him vs HBK at WM 25. 26 was really bad. 27 was worse. I totally would have been more pumped if Sting went to WWE. Personally, I think TNA is a WWE/WCW graveyard. It's a waste of time and money to hire them, only for them to leave a year or two later to go to WWE. Sting will finally realize that TNA sucks and he'd rather be in the HOF than be a champ that only wrestles (and beats) two people in the company. And that's why TNA sucks. They have only 3 guys fightin for the championship, too many Angle/Jarret matches, and poor use of young talent. I mean, the Orton Cena feud as continuous, but it atleast had different match types thrown in evey PPV. And there you go. It went from Taker to Sting to TNA Sucks. TNA can ruin a good conversation, can't it?

I fail to see how Undertaker at WM26 on it's own was "really bad."

Jarrett wrote:

Cole [RIP Savage] wrote:

I agree with all of you. Sting going to TNA was a shitty move. And if you ask me, Taker's best match in recent years was him vs HBK at WM 25. 26 was really bad. 27 was worse. I totally would have been more pumped if Sting went to WWE. Personally, I think TNA is a WWE/WCW graveyard. It's a waste of time and money to hire them, only for them to leave a year or two later to go to WWE. Sting will finally realize that TNA sucks and he'd rather be in the HOF than be a champ that only wrestles (and beats) two people in the company. And that's why TNA sucks. They have only 3 guys fightin for the championship, too many Angle/Jarret matches, and poor use of young talent. I mean, the Orton Cena feud as continuous, but it atleast had different match types thrown in evey PPV. And there you go. It went from Taker to Sting to TNA Sucks. TNA can ruin a good conversation, can't it?

I fail to see how Undertaker at WM26 on it's own was "really bad."

I meant the show itself.

Jarrett wrote:

Another factor is that every year, everyone compares Undertaker's WrestleMania match to the previous years', which can be good or bad.

And every year they say it his 'Greatest Challenge Yet'

Benoit.

CM Punk

JJJEEEESSSSUUUUUSSS

Me.

Ummm because Sting knows TNA's better than WWE? Why would he go to the worse company? See contrary to popular belief a lot of people prefer TNA, I am one of them, I presume Sting is too. Plus he hates WWE and everything it stands for why would he want to be inducted ??

And for the people saying that TNA is WWE/WCWs grave yard go through the roster, under 25% of people are from either company.

Two challengers? Hmmm okay look at the last few months - Anderson challenged, Jeff Hardy challenged, Rob Van Dam challenged, Bully Ray challenged, Matt Hardy challenged.

John Cena? -- Miz and Truth.

Sting's reign was around 40 days longer but he still defended against more than double the opponents Cena did.

Wrestling matters.

OH PS I PICK BENOIT.

God wrote:

Ummm because Sting knows TNA's better than WWE? Why would he go to the worse company? See contrary to popular belief a lot of people prefer TNA, I am one of them, I presume Sting is too. Plus he hates WWE and everything it stands for why would he want to be inducted ??

And for the people saying that TNA is WWE/WCWs grave yard go through the roster, under 25% of people are from either company.

Two challengers? Hmmm okay look at the last few months - Anderson challenged, Jeff Hardy challenged, Rob Van Dam challenged, Bully Ray challenged, Matt Hardy challenged.

John Cena? -- Miz and Truth.

Sting's reign was around 40 days longer but he still defended against more than double the opponents Cena did.

Wrestling matters.

Where did you read that Sting hates the WWE? He didn't say he hated it, he just doesn't want to be the guy who starts over in a new company in front of a new audience. He cites Booker T's WWE debut as the perfect example as to why he wouldn't have gone.

Oh and Randy Savage as well.

Randy Savage, Owen Hart & The Undertaker.