Best Superstar not in HOF

Alot of good ones, Macho Man, Owen Hart, Sting,Benoit (We know why.)

But I would go with Bruno Sanmantino, dude was champ for like 10 years and is not in HOF. Although I think he has said he does not want anything to do with todays WWE.

Like you said, Savage, Hart, Sting, and Sammartino.

Also The Rock. But with WM28 in Miami and him being involved, I figured that would probably come next year.

Taker, Sting, Savage, Sammartino, Hall, Nash, Benoit, Vampiro, etc.

Taker's still in the WWE.

Even Dreamer.

They won't let Dreamer and Sting in.. Why? TNA.

They'll induct Macho Man next year and be a sub headliner next to Rock.

And then Edge will be inducted the night before WrestleMania 29.

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

They won't let Dreamer and Sting in.. Why? TNA.

They'll induct Macho Man next year and be a sub headliner next to Rock.

And then Edge will be inducted the night before WrestleMania 29.

Sting claimed this year he was offered a Hall of Fame induction and a match with Undertaker. Why he'd choose TNA over that, who knows.

Well... Me either. He's in the Main Event in TNA, at Slammiversary.

He probably thinks he'll have the bigger chance in TNA than WWE, which is probably true.

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

Well... Me either. He's in the Main Event in TNA, at Slammiversary.

He probably thinks he'll have the bigger chance in TNA than WWE, which is probably true.

It doesn't matter. He, like Undertaker, do not have much left. I'm certain this is his last real run and TNA and it was foolish to give up an opportunity WWE offered him if what he claimed was actually true. Now he will never again be able to face 'Taker at WrestleMania and who knows if WWE will give him another Hall of Fame offer. A short-lived title run in TNA and putting up with their antics, such as the Jeff Hardy incident previously, pales in comparison to just one sweet match and Hall of Fame induction with the WWE. When he does finish things up, which is probably soon, what would people remember most? A WrestleMania match with Undertaker and Hall of Fame induction or a TNA World title reign?

Randy Savage. Sammartino might have been champ for 8 years, but WWWF had to rely on Bruno cuz they didn't have very many Main Event-caliber wrestlers in that time, Bruno was the only one that could make it in another company like NWA. Savage however was champ in a time when wrestling was booming. When there were a lot of talented individuals. he was great on the mic and in the ring. I think of Hall of Famers as individuals who could shine in any period in wrestling history. Savage would be loved by the entire fanbase if he was wrestling today. he would be huge in the attitude era, maybe not as big as Austin and Rock, but big. he was a star in the 80s, he would have been big in the Sammartino era, and before the WWE in the early 1900s. I don't think Sammartino would have been big in any other era other than his era.

Jarrett wrote:

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

Well... Me either. He's in the Main Event in TNA, at Slammiversary.

He probably thinks he'll have the bigger chance in TNA than WWE, which is probably true.

It doesn't matter. He, like Undertaker, do not have much left. I'm certain this is his last real run and TNA and it was foolish to give up an opportunity WWE offered him if what he claimed was actually true. Now he will never again be able to face 'Taker at WrestleMania and who knows if WWE will give him another Hall of Fame offer. A short-lived title run in TNA and putting up with their antics, such as the Jeff Hardy incident previously, pales in comparison to just one sweet match and Hall of Fame induction with the WWE. When he does finish things up, which is probably soon, what would people remember most? A WrestleMania match with Undertaker and Hall of Fame induction or a TNA World title reign?

But we wouldn't have seen Triple H and Undertaker.

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

Well... Me either. He's in the Main Event in TNA, at Slammiversary.

He probably thinks he'll have the bigger chance in TNA than WWE, which is probably true.

It doesn't matter. He, like Undertaker, do not have much left. I'm certain this is his last real run and TNA and it was foolish to give up an opportunity WWE offered him if what he claimed was actually true. Now he will never again be able to face 'Taker at WrestleMania and who knows if WWE will give him another Hall of Fame offer. A short-lived title run in TNA and putting up with their antics, such as the Jeff Hardy incident previously, pales in comparison to just one sweet match and Hall of Fame induction with the WWE. When he does finish things up, which is probably soon, what would people remember most? A WrestleMania match with Undertaker and Hall of Fame induction or a TNA World title reign?

But we wouldn't have seen Triple H and Undertaker.

Yes we would have. At WrestleMania 17.

Jarrett wrote:

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

Jarrett wrote:

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

Well... Me either. He's in the Main Event in TNA, at Slammiversary.

He probably thinks he'll have the bigger chance in TNA than WWE, which is probably true.

It doesn't matter. He, like Undertaker, do not have much left. I'm certain this is his last real run and TNA and it was foolish to give up an opportunity WWE offered him if what he claimed was actually true. Now he will never again be able to face 'Taker at WrestleMania and who knows if WWE will give him another Hall of Fame offer. A short-lived title run in TNA and putting up with their antics, such as the Jeff Hardy incident previously, pales in comparison to just one sweet match and Hall of Fame induction with the WWE. When he does finish things up, which is probably soon, what would people remember most? A WrestleMania match with Undertaker and Hall of Fame induction or a TNA World title reign?

But we wouldn't have seen Triple H and Undertaker.

Yes we would have. At WrestleMania 17.

Plus, Taker/HHH wasn't that good.

It was good though.

But Taker/HHH was better 10 years after 17.

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

It was good though.

But Taker/HHH was better 10 years after 17.

it wasn't good. you really think it was good? there were so many botches, and taker and haitch seemed off by a few steps.

I seriously thought it was good.

Not as good as HBK, but still.

Triple H likes to bury and throughout the match, he buried 'Taker at times, no pun intended. A back-and-forth like 'Taker and HBK had both years would have been better.

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

I seriously thought it was good.

Not as good as HBK, but still.

i disagree. another thing was that the match didn't flow well. it felt like i was watching a Randy Orton match where its all back and forth and then randomly, boom hells gate, its over. that anticlimatic match just doesn't work well, and i would rather watch a bad taker/sting match than an average hhh/taker match.

How often do you see 2 legendary icons, 1 being the boss' son-in-law and the other defending his undefeated streak at a great event, take chair shots to each other and be fined for it?? I mean it was great!!

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

How often do you see 2 legendary icons, 1 being the boss' daughter and the other defending his undefeated streak at a great event, take chair shots to each other and be sued for it?? I mean it was great!!

1. You just called HHH the boss' daughter.
2. They weren't "sued," they were fined.

at the very best, it was average. not something i would have missed if i hadn't watched it.

Jarrett wrote:

Miami's 4th Heatle wrote:

How often do you see 2 legendary icons, 1 being the boss' son-in-law and the other defending his undefeated streak at a great event, take chair shots to each other and be fined for it?? I mean it was great!!

1. You just called HHH the boss' daughter.
2. They weren't "sued," they were fined.

Sorry! Fixed.

Another factor is that every year, everyone compares Undertaker's WrestleMania match to the previous years', which can be good or bad.

Yeah. What Jarrett said was true. It ALWAYS happens.

I say just enjoy them as they are. Next year, if it happens, is most likely Undertaker's last at WM.