[Spoilers] Different Stipulation For Smackdown MITB Than RAW

As opposed to the all-main-eventers Raw MITB, the following five are the first five to be announced into the SD MITB match:

- Damien Sandow
- Tyson Kidd
- Christian
- Santino Marella
- Tensai

I don't honestly see any of the above winning it, so it kind of makes you wonder if they're going to ruin it by throwing in three or so more and one being a main eventer or something.

I can see them having Christian win it, but none of the rest.

I wouldn't be surprised if Tensai wins it in a bid for the WWE to try and get him over.

Assuming there will be 8 (I don't know why, it's just an inkling) what are your predictions as to the other three? (Or 5 if they do 10, or 1 if they do 6, 2 if they do 7, etc.)

Whoever lost the Ziggler/Del Rio match (didn't read those spoilers) is probably in. I'm also guessing Rhodes. I want either Ziggler or Rhodes to win. Slightly preferably Ziggler. Not sure about the third.

I think an obvious choice for the Money In The Bank Ladder Match is Cody Rhodes. Rhodes could win it and I wouldn't be surprised if he did but to be perfectly honest Cody doesn't need Money In The Bank and can easily become World Heavyweight Champion without it.

The second guy who I think will be in the match is either Dolph Ziggler/Alberto Del Rio depending on who challenges Sheamus for the Championship at the PPV. If Del Rio is in the one in the match then I don't see him winning and the same with Dolph Ziggler but I wouldn't be against him winning it.

The third guy... Wade Barrett. It is no secret that many believe this year to be the Summer Of Barrett, much like last year was the Summer Of Punk. Wade Barrett is my pick to be the final guy in the match and to win it. Of course this is just me speculating but I could definitely see it happening.

Ricardo Rodriguez > God wrote:

I think an obvious choice for the Money In The Bank Ladder Match is Cody Rhodes. Rhodes could win it and I wouldn't be surprised if he did but to be perfectly honest Cody doesn't need Money In The Bank and can easily become World Heavyweight Champion without it.

The second guy who I think will be in the match is either Dolph Ziggler/Alberto Del Rio depending on who challenges Sheamus for the Championship at the PPV. If Del Rio is in the one in the match then I don't see him winning and the same with Dolph Ziggler but I wouldn't be against him winning it.

The third guy... Wade Barrett. It is no secret that many believe this year to be the Summer Of Barrett, much like last year was the Summer Of Punk. Wade Barrett is my pick to be the final guy in the match and to win it. Of course this is just me speculating but I could definitely see it happening.

Shit. How did I forget about Barrett? I am a little concerned seeing as I haven't heard anything about him. Though I remember the time frame of his return was July/August, so it is a possibility. I know they really wanted to push him with MITB, so hopefully he can get that push with or without it. I think Barrett, Rhodes, and Ziggler can one day carry the company if they are really pushed hard, and all would be able to win the WHC without winning MITB, but it has to be one of those three. Or at least I am hoping.

JUST IMAGINE IF KIDD WON IT. omg

Adam wrote:

JUST IMAGINE IF KIDD WON IT. omg

I better move this thread to fantasy wrestling.

"Stupid stipulation..."

You know what, Jarrett? I'm tired of your shit. That 'stupid' stipulation is the reason I'm more excited for the Raw Money in the Bank. Cena in MitB? Hell yea, motherfucker! I didn't see you bitching when Kane won it last year, you punk-ass jive-ass turkey-ass bitch. And Kane isn't exactly an 'up and coming star'. So how about you stop being so negative, you coward of a punk-ass faggot bitch, and actually try to enjoy wrestling? Fuck yourself.

I'm hoping for Barrett.

Fuck Yeah. Barrett.

Barrett or Rhodes.

Big let-down to have Tensai instead of Gabriel in the MITB if you ask me.

Future Surge wrote:

"Stupid stipulation..."

You know what, Jarrett? I'm tired of your shit. That 'stupid' stipulation is the reason I'm more excited for the Raw Money in the Bank. Cena in MitB? Hell yea, motherfucker! I didn't see you bitching when Kane won it last year, you punk-ass jive-ass turkey-ass bitch. And Kane isn't exactly an 'up and coming star'. So how about you stop being so negative, you coward of a punk-ass faggot bitch, and actually try to enjoy wrestling? Fuck yourself.

At least it gave them a chance to even qualify for the match. The purpose is the chance, not the guarantee. But this stipulation blocks that purpose altogether.

Everybody is forgetting one man who is as of yet, unbeaten and wanting a challenge. I am of course, talking about Ryback. What a way to continue his Goldberg push.

He won't win MITB though, that is more unlikely than Tyson Kidd.

No Rhodes I guess?

The Truth Has Set Me Free wrote:

Everybody is forgetting one man who is as of yet, unbeaten and wanting a challenge. I am of course, talking about Ryback. What a way to continue his Goldberg push.

Ryback has gone stale though.

White guy wrote:

The Truth Has Set Me Free wrote:

Everybody is forgetting one man who is as of yet, unbeaten and wanting a challenge. I am of course, talking about Ryback. What a way to continue his Goldberg push.

Ryback has gone stale though.

When was he not stale?

Jarrett wrote:

White guy wrote:

The Truth Has Set Me Free wrote:

Everybody is forgetting one man who is as of yet, unbeaten and wanting a challenge. I am of course, talking about Ryback. What a way to continue his Goldberg push.

Ryback has gone stale though.

When was he not stale?

Good question